Over the past few years we’ve been hearing about various ways that not-for-profit groups should be evaluated. In the US, the conversation has been focused primarily on financial indicators of success (i.e. overhead rates that simply measure the percentage of total dollars that appear to go directly towards programs rather than to ‘overhead’ costs such as administration and fundraising). If you’ve ever tried to run a committee that doesn’t have a leader or organizer you probably have an idea of how short-sighted this measurement is. So what do we track as an alternative? Some organizations are now rightfully attempting to present alternative ways of ranking nonprofits that go beyond financials, but in your everyday life of running a nonprofit organization, should you be providing evaluation outcomes for your fundraising program? This article will attempt to answer that question, as well as what to track and how.
There are three primary reasons for starting/continuing an evaluations component for any program. Primarily, it gives you something to reach for. In Alice in Wonderland one of the characters points out that if you don’t know where you are going, any road will get you there. Stephen Covey offers this as Habit 2 in his book The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People; that is to “Begin with the End in Mind.” In the nonprofit sector, we have funders who require it (along with the general public). If we don’t define what we want to measure ahead of time, it’s likely that a funder or government body will come up with something that could be more difficult and expensive to track (and may be a less accurate measure of what you are attempting to accomplish). In addition, evaluation is important because it helps up see what’s working (and what’s not working). Just because a fundraising program works well down the street or for a similar agency in a different part of the country doesn’t mean that it will work just as well for your organization. So evaluation will help you to determine what to continue (and what to discontinue) for your organization’s fundraising program.
There are many things that you could track in your fundraising program. The one aspect that most people seem to want to jump to first is money. However I’m going to be so bold as to say that I believe that’s the second (or even third) thing that should be measured. Short-term strategies to bring funding in the door quickly could be detrimental to the overall fundraising program and long-term donor intentions. By building long-term relationships with donors, we can ensure a longer-term commitment by the donor (resulting in higher lifetime giving from the donor). It’s quite expensive to acquire a new donor, so the longer they feel an affinity to the organization the better. We want to measure revenue, but interim measurements (such as the numbers of contacts that are made to each donor/prospect, awareness, numbers of volunteers, etc.) may be more important. A third aspect to measure is the cost of fundraising (with a long-term perspective). Not all of the cultivation work that is done this year will result in a gift this year. In fact at one organization I worked at several years ago, it took a full six years or cultivation and negotiation to finalize a $7 million lead gift for a capital campaign. Patience does pay off. There are many smaller groups that don’t have the ability to invest funds in the mean time, but it is an investment that will pay off.
There are many ways to track the indicators listed above, but your primary tool will be your donor database. There are many options out there, and most will provide what you need. However there is no one software program that will be the best choice for every organization. TechSoup.org offers some information to help in this. It’s important to assess what you need it to do, and then select the one that will meet your needs. In addition, be mindful of the GIGO principle (Garbage In, Garbage Out). Spending the time ahead of time to determine how your data will be tracked will be much easier than trying to adjust data once it has been entered inconsistently. A common challenge I’ve seen in this area is that software programs and database administrators often speak a different language than fundraising professionals. This communication breakdown can often leave the fundraising professional believing that the database can’t do what they want it to, when in reality they may have asked something in a way the database administrator didn’t understand.
In closing, please keep it simple. We can spend hours creating plans and reports that give us lots of information, but nothing helpful in planning for the future or accurately evaluating what we’ve accomplished. Identify the 3-5 primarily things that really make a difference in your organization. Then focus on those. Also, test. Test different mailing packages, test different strategies with different donors. You might have some gut feelings about different tactics, but very often our donors don’t think the same way we do. Through testing, some of your gut feelings will be confirmed (and in some cases you may be surprised by the findings). And finally, you can do it. Don’t be overwhelmed by everything that needs to be done, just pick the important things to focus on. You can do it. Really.